Clip Your Carbon Wingspan

January 5th, 2009
There’s no use denying it. Short of travelling by Space Shuttle, flying is the worst way of getting from A to B as far as contributing to climate change is concerned. Although there is considerable debate about exactly how much of humanity’s global greenhouse gas output is due to airplanes, the aviation industry is widely acknowledged to be the fastest growing emitter.
So what’s an environmentally conscious traveler to do? Of course you do all you can to keep your carbon footprint in check, but often there are just no viable alternatives to hopping on a plane. Trekking overland from Jozi to London may be an awesome adventure, but a practical way of getting to your sister’s wedding on time it is not. Durban to Dubai by public transport anyone?
Don’t despair if your next business trip can’t wait for the invention of a super-efficient jet powered by sunflower oil. While the holy grail of truly carbon neutral air travel may well remain elusive for many years, there are a number of practical, cheap and easy things you can do to keep your carbon wingspan down to an ethically-defensible size.
Travel Light
Every kilogram of extra weight you add to your luggage requires a little bit more jet fuel. That might sound trivial, but it all adds up. So take that third pair of shoes and your dumbbells out of your suitcase now!
Fly Non-stop and Direct
Take-off and landing are the most fuel-intense bits of any plane trip and account for a large proportion of total emissions. Avoid stop-overs, detours and connecting flights wherever possible. Always choose the most direct route – the longer the flight, the more fuel is burned.
Travel Smart
Use teleconferencing and other modern communication tools to avoid unnecessary business trips. When you do have to fly for work, schedule meetings to optimize your travel time – is it really necessary to fly to Cape Town twice in the same week?
Fly Economy
More legroom in business class translates into fewer seats and more fuel used - and thus more greenhouse gasses emitted - per passenger. Carbon emissions for business class flights have been estimated to be as much as twice those for economy class.
Pick Your Airline
If you have the option, try to choose an airline with a modern fleet of planes – airplane fuel efficiency has improved significantly in recent years. Choose an airline with a good “on-time” record, especially for international flights. Delays are often the result of waiting planes circling above airports burning fuel unnecessarily all as a result of poor planning.
Offset Your Flying Miles
There are numerous organizations that allow you to offset your air travel carbon emissions online. The process is easy and quick: you calculate the amount of greenhouse gasses you are responsible for and pay money towards a variety of climate protection projects around the globe. The trend these days is away from tree-planting projects and towards schemes developing renewable energy sources, environmentally sustainable business solutions and energy efficiency. Next time you fly, why not repay your carbon sins through one of these reputable non-profit organizations?
Why not visit these sites for more information:
|
Making in your mark Head to Durban with great summer deals for as little as R1 630 and it includes includes flights, car rental and accommodation. Book now! |
New religionSubmitted by thomas on Thu, 11/19/2009 - 05:00. |
This religion is here to stay. It is taught to all children at school and if they query anything it has the same reaction as asking if God exists. |
Climate expertsSubmitted by Engineer on Thu, 11/19/2009 - 02:22. |
I am an engineer, and getting furiously fed-up with people with NO scientific background making half-informed statements related to the "new religion", the "environment". Just about everything being published about "climate change" is full of blatant lies, skewed statistics and emotionally-laden fallacies. This army of "climate activists" will without shame make the statement that "the end justifies the means", basically admitting to lying and expecting you to swallow it in the same statement! I wonder if these people, when their campaign has caused the poor to be even poorer, food to be many orders of magnitude more expensive leading to an obvious result, if they will even begin to feel the slightest amount of guilt. I regard my profession as an engineer as a calling, and the insinuation that my profession is raping nature as a personal insult. I know it is not wise to argue with fools, as you may appear to be one of them; but I can no longer remain quiet when I am faced with these lies! |
Factually Incorrect - Deliberately Misleading?Submitted by Suidlander on Wed, 11/18/2009 - 20:38. |
CO2 emissions for round trip Jhb-London: Plane travel: 4400 pounds, Car travel: 10200 pounds. FAIL! |
Research required!Submitted by Hannes on Wed, 11/18/2009 - 19:59. |
Andreas, your article is not only misleading, it also requires some research! The shuttle doesn't have a carbon footprint, it does not burn carbon based fuels. Wake up, you are not writing to a bunch of idiots! If you are going to publish something, at least get your facts straight. |
Carbon emissions by aircraftSubmitted by Iceberg on Wed, 11/18/2009 - 16:01. |
Your article is misleading. The airline industry contributes less than 3 % of carbon emissions worldwide. Look at the math: A Boeing uses 240000l of fuel to carry 300 people 11000 km to London. (Very rough numbers, but just to get the ballpark figure). Now to carry one person 100km you get 240000/110/300 =7.2l/100km. This is less than what most people driving around on their own burn everyday in their cars. |



Sponsored Links
| Life Insurance | |
| Car & Household Insurance | |



























